Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick foley greatest hit and misses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Mick foley greatest hit and misses

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like a movie review. Fails WP:N.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 06:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) 06:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Mick Foley - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 10:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge a small amount of this info. into Mick Foley (and rd): no evidence of notability for this DVD. JJL (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing mergable. Reads like a review/promotional copy. No evidence of notability for the DVD. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 01:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I agree with User:Doc Strange. Reads like some fanboy's personal review. J I P  | Talk 06:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This article previously existed as its grammatically correct title, Mick Foley's Greatest Hits and Misses. That was turned into a redirect to Mick Foley eight months ago. Unless we think this spelling is a plausible redirect, just delete. Last revision of grammatically correct title before redirecting - it's a lot better in terms of article construction and should be what's considered for any merger. Nosleep  break my slumber 06:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.