Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey factz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep and move to Mickey Factz. Tim Song (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Mickey factz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable musician who has not enough significant coverage by non-trivial published works, nor has he released anything other than independent albums. Article of the subject has been deleted six times.1, 2 Still fails WP:MUSIC. Karppinen (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, definitley not NOTABLE for inclusion on Wikipedia.--John Chestpack (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I attempted to move (rename) the page to "Mickey Factz" so the guy's last name is capitalized like in the land of people who know how to spell. I got this message: You cannot move a page to this location, because the new title has been protected from creation. So as noted by the nominator, not only have articles about this guy already been deleted but an admin also applied the old salt. We can assume that the article creator is simply trying again with a slightly different article title. Is this a reason for speedy deletion? Perhaps a block on the editor(s) too? D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 22:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - allow me to add WP:NOTMYSPACE to the rationales already contributed. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 22:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to keep: Per Gongshow. We all missed some important coverage. I promise to do a better search next time. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Was previously deleted and salted under another name. Joe Chill (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to keep: Per Gongshow. Joe Chill (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol merge vote.svg|15px]][[Image:Symbol redirect vote.svg|15px]] Delete — A technical glitch allowed this article to be created; actions to take: block user, create protect new name, etc. m o ɳ o  00:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Significant coverage exists in Billboard, Spin , Vibe , and The Fader (, from the article), for starters. Regardless of the previous deletions, an article is appropriate as this artist meets criterion 1 of WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow  Talk 21:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural Comment: If the article is kept, it should be renamed so the guy's last name is capitalized, and the current restriction against creating an article of that exact title should be removed. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment The body of the article has been blanked as a copyright violation and will have to be removed or rewritten if the article is kept. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:46, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I will rewrite the body of the article; it should take me about an hour or so.  Gongshow  Talk 02:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have re-written the body of the article. It can be viewed here.  Gongshow  Talk 03:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, I've placed it in the main article. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily notable, and shows it now. Well done Gongshow! Alzarian16 (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.