Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro-Goo-pple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  Dei zio  talk 22:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Micro-Goo-pple
Signed personal essay, neologism, original research, etc. Might be more suited to Wikibooks. Might not. Kiand 23:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ted 23:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Copyright violation - since the author asserts copyright within the text. - Richardcavell 23:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this breaks hmm.. let me see, almost every Wikipedia policy, and the most of its guidelines. -- E ivindt@c 23:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Philip Gronowski Contribs 00:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete wtf? This should be speedied as per EivindFOyangen. --Strothra 00:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't a place for short essays full of undeveloped points, especially, seeing as most of them are based solely on opinion. -- Faero


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.