Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroSIP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

MicroSIP

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSOFT Mfixerer (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. It has limited media coverage, but I'm not sure how much the media would cover something so esoteric. There is robust discussion about it (which indicates wide usage) on platforms like reddit and Youtube.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm seeing a respectable amount of discussion in academic papers (e.g. here)— Moriwen (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep it's got decent industry adoption, as evidenced by several scholarly articles, as well as a very large number of how-to's. it's kinda esoteric, but still notable. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 20:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.