Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro Bucky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Micro Bucky

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely non-notable software with no claims of notability. Seemingly created by software creator. Advertising. Canterbury Tail  talk  12:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Micro Bucky is one of a handful of server-side micro-blogs available for download on Google Code and other Open-Source source code web sites. The recent rise of Twitter, a 3rd party micro-blog, has prompted individuals and organisations to look for an Open-Source alternative to this type of service that they can host on their own servers. Micro Bucky is a legitimate, server-side, and functional micro-blog available for the popular Apache, MySQL, and PHP frameworl that a large percentage of people use everyday. It is currently hosted on Google Code and has a promising start to becoming a major competitor in server-side micro-blogs.

Micro Bucky is an active and evolving project that is indexed in Google, Google Code, Yahoo, and Ask.com.

This project is advertised and indexed at the above search engines and referenced and externally linked locations. The article follows the formatting and information density as [Grooner Micro Blog]. The Micro Bucky entry should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbucky (talk • contribs) 07:51, 19 May 2009


 * Other stuff existing is not a reason for inclusion. The software was available two days ago. And the links you'd posted above aren't valid. If you search with quotes you get entirely different results as here. I also notice from the hosting page that it's been downloaded a grand total of 3 times in the 37 hours it's been available. Completely non-notable and simply self advertising. Canterbury Tail   talk  12:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Canterbury Tail. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 17:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced, non-notable. A google search is not a reference.  Creator should review reliable sources for acceptable references. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare)  22:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No 3rd party refs to establish notability Dialectric (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.