Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro Expansion v/s Macro expansion in Business


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Micro Expansion v/s Macro expansion in Business
Prod removed without comment. Author has written an Original Research, personal opinion essay, and thinks this is the place to post it. I disagree. Fan-1967 05:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete (but gently) as original research. Interesting theory.  If it can be rewritten with proper citations and moved to a more plausible title, it might be a keeper. - Lucky 6.9 05:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (but re-name) not so much original research - more like stating the obvious in a very clumsy way — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.0.106.130 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. However, if it is rewritten, it should stay. -  jlao   0  4  11:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is a personal essay, not an article. Have you tried contacting a magazine? J I P  | Talk 13:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an aessay and original research. Nothing salvageable. -- Whpq 17:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete An essay as has been said, and admittedly and unashamedly personal point of view.  Not recoverable, but the author could possibly start again and present the details in an encyclopaedic form.  Emeraude 18:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete clear violation of WP:NOR --Steve 23:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.