Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microgiving


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Charitable_contribution. Any content worth merging can be pulled form the page history. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Microgiving

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was tagged as G11, but the history relates that the article's been here for a few years, and I don't like axing articles that have been here for that long without some discussion. I site advertising/promotion as the reason to delete this article, given the way it currently reads, I would not be all that surprised if copyright or plagerism aspects were a factor too. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - it is currently a bit spammish, but I think it can be re-written. Bearian (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:14, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * seems like promotion for a website, trying to coin a new term themselves without any organic basis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmehrabi (talk • contribs) 00:51, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - The term Microgiving is a fairly common term in the world of Finance, particularly with regards to fundrasers. I think we should keep this one. --Kumioko (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Charitable_contribution. The term is real, and deserves some coverage, at Charitable_contribution, but it is used as a veneer to cover a non-notable company (see WP:CORP).  At the target article, it may be justifiable to mention the company in passing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete. The article seems to conflate the concept with the eponymous specific implementation; the former could be notable, but the latter sounds like self-promotion. Merge it into microphilanthropy? --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.