Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microlecture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. No new comments after two relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Microlecture

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A hat-rack article with no clear topic. Primarily a list of citations, rather than actual content. Walsh90210 (talk) 03:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 03:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is written pretty badly but the large number of sources are in fact good. There are a whole lot of studies but it seems like there would almost definitely be at least 3 in there specifically mentioning microlectures which are also reliable and secondary.
 * e.g.
 * 1. https://statenews.com/article/2009/03/microlectures_turn_lessons_into_interactive_snippets
 * 2. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2010/11/10/teaching-in-one-minute-snippets.aspx
 * 3. (off google not the thing, accepts submissions from non-journalists) https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/online-course-delivery-and-instruction/microlectures-101-what-why-how/
 * 4. (from the thing) short mention in fox news
 * So the article has a clear topic, at least 2 reliable secondary sources, and a number of journal articles (plus many, many unreliable blogs). I think there's not really a good case to delete here, the article is just bad and basically needs to be started from scratch without all the blogs. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That said it might be a fad and not be the sustained coverage policy, but I'd say keep it. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Is there a different word for "lectures on TikTok"? I would not be too surprised if there is more coverage of the general concept under a different name.  I'm not entirely convinced yet, but the links at  (which links to your link 3) suggest this might be "keep but re-write". Walsh90210 (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 05:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.