Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micropolygyria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep; closed as moot. The current article has been rewritten, and is no longer the nominated article. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Micropolygyria

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Transwiki & Delete unless expanded to show us why it's important. Dicdef: every disease has a name but an article just telling us that there is a disease of this name really isn't encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 19:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ugh. Definitely a sub-stub, without enough context to evaluate, really.  Not much would be lost in deleting this six word article.   But it seems real enough: Google Scholar counts 344 hits, so it seems to be a subject that is both real and worthwhile.  I'd try to interpret some of the material and expand it, but my neurons have all flown down to the Bahamas where they spend the winter, so it might be better expanded by someone who understood what they were looking at. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The term certainly seems legit, and the page has only been there for three days - give it a chance! It may be better merged into another article, but you'd need insider knowdedge to know where. This AfD was done way too soon - there must be 10,000 crap pages that could be nominated before this one. MarkBul 21:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions.   —Espresso Addict 09:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although there are only 8 hits on Medline, there seems to be potential for an expert to expand this beyond a dictionary definition. Espresso Addict 10:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It is not a disease exactly, but rather a pathological growth pattern,  present in a number of specific neurological diseases, notably. Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy. I have replaced the vague content of the article with something meaningful from a RS & given the links and some references, just as a start.  A fuller explanation can & should be written. DGG (talk) 23:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Unless someone steps forward soon and proposes some new grounds to delete this, I mean to close this as moot.  The article has been entirely rewritten and seems to me to be a reasonable stub now. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.