Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsat Systems Canada Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Microsat Systems Canada Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think this company is notable. It seems that they have a contract with NASA, but that's all the news I can find--and even that is not on a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 21:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC) --Jphil125 (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Written by someone from the company and little better than spam. &mdash; RHaworth 21:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Also, the sources seem to be containing self submitted information, so are not really sources, per se.  S ven M anguard   Wha?
 * Comment The authors full disclosure is available on the users talk page. This article was written in a factual, unbiased and non-promotional manner. If you believe differently, please identify the specific issues so they can be rectified. Sources from the Canadian Space Agency and Industry Canada have also been added for validation. MSCI provided Attitude Control Systems for the following satellites all with entries in Wikipedia; FedSat, CHIPSat, TacSat-2, EgyptSat 1, Proba-2, LADEE, and has manufactured the attitude control system and the entire microsatellite for MOST and NEOSSat also defined in Wikipedia. I believe this makes MSCI's inclusion into Wikipedia relevant and notable.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, company doesn't meet Notability (organizations and companies). Lacks coverage in reliable third-party publications.  PK T (alk)  23:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no claim of notability made for this company. Abductive  (reasoning) 04:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.