Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft 12 block puzzle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Microsoft 12 block puzzle
Article about a piece of swag that Microsoft gives out - not notable GabrielF 01:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. Is it technically a variation of a Rubik's cube? If so, the relevant info could be added there. SliceNYC 01:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Rubik's cube --Ageo020 01:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Ageo020. Not notable enough for its own article. 1ne 03:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Whats the reason for merging it? So MS gives away a rip off version of a Rubicks cube. You think you're gonna find a citation that ties this puzzle to the Rubicks cube? No citation, no source, no merge. Else its WP:OR.SynergeticMaggot 04:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can find a mass-market name for it. Gazpacho 04:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 15 blocks short of being a proper Rubik's cube ripoff.  Not worth merging.  Thatdog 05:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Thatdog. --MaNeMeBasat 05:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is not a Rubik's cube, and this is merely a promotional toy branded with Microsoft's logo. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-17 06:11Z 
 * Delete, not a Rubik's cube, but a folding block puzzle or puzzle cube, a type used for promotional items for over a century. This one is not notable. --Dhartung | Talk 11:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Whpq 16:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do not pass go, do not merge to Rubik's cube, do not collect $200.  RFerreira 21:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.