Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Casual Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Semi-procedural close; a discussion of if/where to merge this is ongoing elsewhere. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Microsoft Casual Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Suggest merge to Microsoft  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per WP:SK. Proposed mergers is that way. Regards So  Why  11:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's anything wrong with the nom suggesting where content could go. It doesn't change the provided deletion rationale of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. SK#1 applies if no deletion rationale was given. -- ferret (talk) 11:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Per WP:ATD-M and WP:PRESERVE, if a problem with content can be addressed by editing (which includes merging), deletion is not the correct way to handle it. And if the nominator admits that this can be handled by merging, the only question is, why don't they do that instead? Regards So  Why  11:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. -- ferret (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Per SoWhy. The likely outcome here is a redirect or merge, so just do it in my humble opinion. -- ferret (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello i am MegaMEX2001 the creator of article of Microsoft Casual Games, one the reasons whereby I wrote the article, it was with the intention of mainly informing readers who have a taste for videogames either on developers, genres, graphic design among others. This helping to solve doubts those who have the interest to know about which teams of developers have made the amount of games.

I'm a fan of Microsoft Studios games. I also like Sony Interactive Entertainment and Nintendo games, but one of my favorite companies is the aforementioned one, the reason why I wrote the article is that I was curious that when entering the official page of Microsoft Studios, you will be able to find, an option in the part of above in the right the studies that have the same division, among them 'Microsoft Casula Games'.

https://www.microsoftstudios.com/

if we visit in its official page we can see that this small team is responsible for the development of the classic games that appeared in Windows systems later.

however, if we visit that same page we will get 4 options, 'home', 'games', 'community' and 'about'. if we give in the last option 'about', we will appear that it is a small team in charge of developing the classic games of Microsoft Windows.

https://microsoftcasualgames.com/#about — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)


 * Not enough for a standalone article, . I've started a merger discussion in this place. Sorry for wasting your time. Merger Discussion.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I understand that the article is small, but at least reports that it is an internal Microsoft study, although I think that in the future you can mention something related to Microsoft Casual Games User:MegaMEX2001 ''' 01:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello my colleague  Lee Vilenski , since the night I was investigating a bit of the Microsoft Casual Games team, I found your YouTube channel and if it is a team dedicated to the development of games--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ29-dg0T5c. Currently they are developing a new game in which you can visit from your YouTube channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaMEX2001 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 20 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.