Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Interactive Media Manager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Microsoft Interactive Media Manager

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sources to prove WP:N. No good WP:ATD. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Any thoughts on the sources? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 14:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing found for this software, hits are all about cloud stuff now. Oaktree b (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Following sources for IMM: book GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Per Oaktree. Amuckabak (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with SharePoint as an ATD. Fails NPRODUCT. Regarding the sources provided above: 1 and 2 are press release, book is from a self-publishing press (CreateSpace), 3 is ROUTINE coverage of the product shutting down, 4 is routine coverage in a trade publication, 5, 7, and 8 are the same source, and is a technical manual about how the software implements Web Ontology Language, 6 is a brief mention, and 9 is also a brief mention. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.