Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Office Language Packs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. This is indeed a copyvio  DGG ( talk ) 17:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Microsoft Office Language Packs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not establish its notability as required by WP:N, lacks source and for the most part, is an original research.

This article is previously deleted through PROD (see ) but seems to have revived it without reviving the edit history and with a merger proposal. But original research cannot be merged. Furthermore, I cannot possibly invite the original contributors to this AfD. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * My error in not restoring the history--I've fixed it. A merge is easily possible, but as a major component of a famous software system, I think an article of its own is justified.  DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete for G11+G12. I knew within a second this was copy-vio cut-n-paste, and within five more on Google to confirm it. Pax 09:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * maybe restore also the talk page for an old prod full etc. Was this an emulated PROD contest after the fact, or an ordinary undeletion? If all you want is to merge some old content, and you have the rights to see it anyway, I don't get why you undeleted the article. Confused: –Be..anyone (talk) 09:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * In order to preserve attribution, I hunk it necessary to undelete content before it is merged; otherwise no non-admin user could see the history.   DGG ( talk ) 17:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.