Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft codename "Acropolis"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Microsoft codename "Acropolis"

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 23:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 23:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 23:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 23:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. This article about a failed never-released software product is not notable. It uses only a Microsoft blog post as a source. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - failed and unreleased software product, evidently fails WP:GNG. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - If, in fact, this program was a building block for .NET Framework and Silverlight, then that information (along with appropriate citations) could potentially be included in those articles. Oddly enough the download link is still functional on MS site, but the fact that this Wikipedia article is the very first Google hit on the topic is a pretty clear sign. Stealthninjaduck (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking sourcing. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.