Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microvision Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Microvision Incorporated

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A promo of a nonnotable business - Altenmann >t 17:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S to those who will be doing google check: do not confuse with Microvision. - Altenmann >t 17:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable IJA (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable as per WP:CORP.  They make lasers for barcode scanners.  If one will forgive me for putting my tongue in my cheek, it's depressing that these lasers aren't even outfitted for mounting on the heads of friggin' sharks. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:CORP. ArcAngel (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. No way this business is going to ever become a household name. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The company has just (literally, within the last week) shipped its picoprojector product. Since picoprojectors are a current "hot" technology item, it would be short-sighted to delete the article right at the moment the company actually does something you guys might consider relevant. (In any case, the comments for delete above show that the commentators don't even know what Microvision does for barcode scanners - they *don't* make the lasers, they make the scanning MEMS mirrors and assembly. Is a vote for delete relevant from someone who knows too little about a subject to actually comment on its notability?) As per WP:CORP, in fact, I cite: http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/microvisions-show-wx-pico-projector-out-soon/ (and numerous other articles from gadget sites over the last year and a bit) 81.156.5.130 (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.