Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midhir Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Midhir Records

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP; cited sources do not meet the requirements of WP:ORGIND as they are run by Midhir Records themselves. I searched in multiple places but found no sources satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH. Google News has nothing. Google Books has some directory listings and nothing more. ProQuest also came back with nothing.

Clearly not one of the more important indie labels per WP:NMUSIC either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies,  and Northern Ireland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:MUSIC being the controlling interest here, we can see on Discogs that the label only ever released one full-length album. Even if there were multiple independent sources about this label, I'd still argue it's not worth covering here. Chubbles (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per inability to find sufficient suitable sources to meet GNG, does not meet NMUSIC per Siderone or Chubbles, and no found evidence the label has had significant impact on region or genre of art (COMMONSENSE).  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 18:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.