Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midsommer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Unanimous consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Midsommer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This film article proves quite difficult to improve as well as find reliable sources due to its lack of notability. Deleting it would be the better option.  Blue sphere  15:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: It's hard to find strong English-language sources and I don't speak Danish, but a 2009 PROD was contested because "film has been reviewed by multiple RS, won a Robert Award and was nominated for several others (Denmark's highest filming honor)". The sources I found only suggest one nomination, for a song from the soundtrack. I've added that to the article. Between that and being remade as a film starring a major actress (Amanda Seyfried) I think this is worth keeping, but I wouldn't fight for it hard. Mortee (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Correction - the song won Mortee (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Alternative search:
 * Director and title:


 * Comment try the above search. I can source it, and so can you if you speak the language. — Sam Sailor 21:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 21:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 21:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Film passes requirements for WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Multiple reviews by major national newspapers, , . Won the Robert Award (Danish Academy Award) for best original song and Jury Award at the Leeds International Film Festival . Received some analysis (5 pages) in book manuscript by a Swedish university professor There should be enough  significant coverage here to pass notability criteria. —  Cactus Writer (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Good job, mate! I shall add some of these in to the article. Someone should take up the mantle with regard to the Danish sources as I don't speak that language. While Google Translate might be a good idea, I might mistakenly add the wrong infos and I wouldn't want that.  Blue sphere  07:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've done a slight copy-edit and added references. I think it's good enough as a start article now. — Cactus Writer (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Have recent edits saved this article from deletion?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG with the added sources. — Sam Sailor 02:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.