Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtown Walmart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Criticism of Walmart. ‑Scottywong | confess _ 16:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Midtown Walmart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NOT. Individual Wal-Mart. Prevan (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's more of an article on a development controversy in a gentrifying neighborhood than a store. It has a multitude of reliable sources across many publications. B137 (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge to Miami. This does have sourcing but it does not seem to be notable enough in itself for it's own article.  It's a single event in one area, therefore suggest merging it to that city's page if the content is to be kept. --  Dane  talk  01:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The city is way too big for a merge. Prevan (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It would be merged with Midtown Miami or Wynwood, the "prominent" neighborhoods it is a part of. B137 (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: As a liberal keeptionist, what's it hurting? B137 (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userify, it seems to be WP:TOOSOON for this article, considering the construction project is on hold. Currently we have a Wikipedia article about a planning application. The comparisons with other Walmarts aeems to be WP:OR, because the news articles about the Miami Walmart don't make these comparisons. Sionk (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Criticism of Walmart. I'm going to cite WP:IMPACT as the reason for keeping this one. Sure it's just a Walmart, but most Walmarts are built with little or no resistance or controversy. This one has a broader impact on the community itself. I agree that some of the article uses original research, but it's otherwise well-written and worth keeping in my opinion. Or at least merging with Criticism of Walmart. Gargleafg (talk) 04:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Criticism of Walmart feels like a good plan to me.Clawsyclaw (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.