Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midworth

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 16:49, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Midworth
Looks like a hoax, see also Votes for deletion/Kevin Tubb and Votes for deletion/Jim Byng by the same contributor. Thue | talk 12:28, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete I think it should be a speedy delete as it m,ay be insulting or offensive to real people and is manifest nonsense when taken with the other two. Dabbler 15:17, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article does not establish notability, possible hoax. Megan1967 00:30, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax. Possible attack on real, non-notable people. -- RHaworth 07:16, 2005 Feb 23 (UTC)
 * Ah. These must be the pupils who wrote the attack articles about their Business Studies teachers.  I was hoping to rescue this as an article about a place or some such.  I turned up a footballer named Midworth, a neologism "mid-worth", and a street.  But I couldn't find any rewrite fodder.  Delete. Uncle G 14:08, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)