Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mieris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Disambiguate (already done). kingboyk 13:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Mieris
As I was proofreading some 1911 articles, I came across this (which I had imported a few weeks back); I then followed some of the links and discovered that each member of the family mentioned in the 1911 article has a separate article in Wikipedia (usually with an image as well). I think we should delete this article since its the same information as in the separate articles (Frans van Mieris, Sr., Willem van Mieris, and Frans van Mieris jr.. I imported it without searching deep enough; my bad. --FeanorStar7 01:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge any useful information into the individual articles and turn it into a disambiguation page. --Aim Here 01:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Aim Here took the words out of my mouth: merge anything of value and then  . -- Kinu  t /c  01:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Since this is a self-nom, would it be out of line for FeanorStar7 to just do the merge then ask for a speedy close? Thatcher131 02:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, it would be the best way. Uncontroversial manouvers don't need AFD. In fact as a user in good standing, if there's no delete votes at the time he can close the debate himself. --kingboyk 06:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Disambiguate, taking whatever info isn't duplicated already and adding it to the articles. Don't need AFD for this. ProhibitOnions 10:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Disambig and merge Straightforward here. --Larsinio 19:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi all, thanks for your input; I agree about the disambig and merge; how long do I have to wait until I can go ahead and do it; I seem to remember there is a time frame of 5 days before a final decision is made? --FeanorStar7 23:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You can do it now. The 5 days timeframe is for actual deletions, not for edits, which are allowed throughout. If the unexpected happens and we're inundated with a late flood of votes saying 'DELETE THIS MOST BOGUS ARTICLE NOW!!!!', the article can still be deleted. --Aim Here 00:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation complete; hope I did it right; feel free to correct or add info. --FeanorStar7 01:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep Could use a merge. --Masssiveego 05:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteNewyorktimescrossword 07:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Masssiveego. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  12:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.