Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mighil Puthukkudy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Mighil Puthukkudy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSICBIO. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article might be an attempted promotion for a studio dweller who has not yet been noticed by any significant and reliable media. Appearance in Rolling Stone India is just brief inclusion in a variety playlist of new songs, and not under his own name but one of his project's names. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Wholly promotional and unsourced. RationalPuff (talk) 17:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.