Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mighty Moshin' Emo Rangers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Mighty Moshin' Emo Rangers
Non-notable. It has been discussed and deleted before (see Articles for deletion/Mighty Moshin' Emo Rangers), but the content has been substantially changed and expanded. TigerShark 19:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets basic notability standard with a story on MTV and a mention about the emo subculture at the UK Times . It's also available on iFilm, which doesn't take any old content, as far as I know. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Jeff. Which notabiliy criteria are you using? I have tried to fit it with the film criteria, but can't. The Times article just seems to be a fairly random reference to a film found by the journalist and I'm not sure how important the MTV review is (does anybody know how difficult it is to get a review there?). Regarding the iFilm inclusion, they may not take rubbish but, again, how hard is it to get on there? Cheers TigerShark 21:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * NOTFILM would not apply here anyway, as it's a nonbinding essay lacking broad support. I think the MTV + Times citation meet WP:WEB, as I also believe its inclusion on iFilm does ("The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.").  --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, the MTV article causes it to meet my criteria for inclusion. JYolkowski // talk 02:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per above Huangcjz 15:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.