Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MigreLief


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

MigreLief

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Entirely promotional article, borderline WP:CSD. This medication may or may not be notable, but if it is, this article needs to be trashed and rewritten by somebody who does not have an obvious WP:COI.  Sandstein  21:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per sandstein. Not a notable product.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  22:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I went through the article, and despite a long list of "sources", I failed to find even one decent source that (1) wasn't published by the company and (2) mentioned the product by name (rather than one of its primary ingredients).  Some of these sources might be useful in articles like Feverfew (to make strictly non-company-specific claims), but they don't demonstrate notability for this specific product.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not important whether it's a notable medication, however it's purely promotional as there are more slogans in the article than any real information, also there is no criticism to be found, the details of the article are too specific and to be found on the label of the product. Also, if one just looks at the reference and "further reading" lists, it's clear that these are meant to be promotional.90.191.190.65 (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.