Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel A. Jenkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Nominator's rationale is sound and there's no objections to deletion so I'm treating this as an uncontested PROD. Since it has sources this article can be restored upon request at requests for undeletion. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Miguel A. Jenkins

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable musician: there's lots of little bits that might establish notability, but they don't quite do so. Having talents sufficient to meet and work with celebrities doesn't make you notable. The footnotes might suggest notability: the National Academy of Recording Artists - the people who put on the Grammy Awards, right? But working with NARAS to lobby the government doesn't make you notable in the same way as winning a Grammy does.

Google test doesn't bring up enough to establish notability. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.