Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Arcángel Roscigna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no-one favouring deletion. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Miguel Arcángel Roscigna

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Nominator's rationale: There is not much sources or information about this person. Myself and other have expanded it, but weren't able to do much. If it can't be expanded much more then I don't think there is much point in keeping it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. I have now expanded it as much as I can with the information that I have found. Anyone who knows the language Spanish, please add the information from the Spanish article after converting it to English to this article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand using the sources in the Spanish Wikipedia article, which are not yet used here. Pam  D  05:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you think that you can find someone who can convert the Spanish article into English. If this can be done then I think the article should surely be kept. Davidgoodheart (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. You only have to click on the word "books" above to find many sources, including, for example, extensive coverage in ISBN 9781849353199. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have that book and did not see the subject indexed or mentioned, for what it's worth. czar  17:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * One of the mentions is shown here. There are plenty more. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I confused that title with Suriano's Paradoxes of Utopia—my error czar  18:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty on the subject in And since AfD is not cleanup, the existence of the source material is enough—there's no pressing need to translate the article from the ES.WP article (much of which is unsourced). This said, I'm sure you'd find an offer if you asked WT:@.  czar  17:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see if you can expanded the article were more information. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, David, but I don't have the time or the inclination to so immediately. It has been shown here that more information is available in reliable sources, which is what counts for notability rather than the current state of the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.