Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Gandelman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Miguel Gandelman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication that this person is notable by our standards. It's a COI creation, it's still plagued by COI editors who seem to think we're MySpace, and a search through the history suggests the current version, as bad as it is, is an improvement--but no secondary sourcing, and no valid claim to notability. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable at all. Nothing found in GNews. Oaktree b (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of any SIGCOV from reliable/independent sources to demonstrate his notability.Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG. We are not a WP:SOAPBOX. Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 23:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.