Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Santos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 01:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Miguel Santos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:FOOTYN Op47 (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * This player plays for S.L. Benfica B who plays in the Segunda Liga who is a Fully professional league. He is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexanderalgrim (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL, confirmed by this. Article needs improving, not deleting. Also worth noting that WP:FOOTYN cited by the nominator is merely a WikiProject's essay, which was written many years ago, and which is not fit for purpose any more. GiantSnowman 18:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per official website of Benfica, passes on second criteria of WP:NFOOTBALL. Hitro   talk  20:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Withdraw The article on S.L. Benfica B seemed to say it was the reserve team. Clearly I got the wrong end of the stick. Op47 (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.