Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihai Albu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Mihai Albu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We're dealing with a very determined self-promoter - single-purpose account Ionmihaialbu was apparently not enough, so he's come back with single-purpose account AdaOpait after this article was speedily deleted - one who informs us that "it is very important for Mihai Albu to be on Wikipedia". Well, I would think that's for the community to decide, and I hope we'll decide he isn't notable due to failing WP:BIO. - Biruitorul Talk 17:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Albu is notable, if at all, solely for having created the highest heeled shoe ever. Given that the shoe is more sculpture than fashion, this is a very thin claim to fame at all. Certainly not sufficient notability for Wikipedia purposes. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly fails BLP1E. The article should be speedy-died under CSD G11. Drikulaeri  talk  17:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject is only notable for his shoe designs. Meatsgains (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I speedied this once, and explained why it was not acceptable Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, interesting the tone of some of the editor's comments above ie. "is notable, if at all, solely for having created the highest heeled shoe ever", "only notable for his shoe designs", the same could be said about 1000s of sportspeople articles ie. "x is only notable for playing (insert name of sport here)", with that little rant out of the way:), cnsnews and Daily Mail refs probably aren't enough, could there be some Romanian sources? Coolabahapple (talk) 19:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 19:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.