Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihai Badoiu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Mihai Badoiu

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nice autobiography there, but the subject is utterly lacking in the "significant coverage" in sources "independent of the subject" mandated by WP:GNG. Biruitorul Talk 05:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete Nice autobiography but completly unnoteable. His only claim for noteability is the informatics link which i think says it all Tresiden (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Added verifiable references on publications. MBadoiu 21:57, 29 April 2009 (EDT)
 * That your name appears on those articles does not mean you yourself are notable. See WP:GNG - sources must provide "significant coverage" (addressing the subject - you, not your research - directly in detail) and be "independent of the subject" (you cannot use your own articles to prove you are notable). - Biruitorul Talk 04:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't pass the guidelines at WP:ACADEMIC. Fences and windows (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. According to Google Scholar there are a few hundred citations to papers where the subject is listed as the first author, but I'm not qualified to judge either whether being first author is significant or whether this is a high enough number of citations for notability in this field. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * In this area, author lists are almost always alphabetical, so placement in the list is meaningless. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Impressive credentials, but does not meet any notability criteria. Johndowning (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.