Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihai Rotea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Mihai Rotea

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I don't quite see this individual fulfilling WP:PROF. There's an unsourced claim that he headed a museum, but I don't know if that would automatically confer notability on him, even if attributed. Other than that, he seems a rather standard archaeologist: a good run of research, to be sure, but nothing to entitle him a berth in this encyclopedia. Nothing, that is, aside from having his relative, User:Roteadan, write his biography&mdash;an act we should negate through deletion. Biruitorul Talk 14:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per views of nom. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. I couldn't find much on Gscholar. This being an obscure field, it's possible that the notability exists, but if we can't verify it with the tools available to us, then our guidelines tell us to delete. Ray  Talk 08:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.