Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihkel Võrang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Go  Phightins  !  01:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Mihkel Võrang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This player completely fails to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY, per the discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Jaanus_Sorokin --Nug (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Nug (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. --Nug (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets criteria #6 of WP:NHOCKEY “Played on a senior national team (such as at the Olympic Games or World Championship).” Member of the Estonia men's national ice hockey team from 2010 to 2014.. Dolovis (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete While he meets nhockey by playing in a lower non-championship division of the world championships. He does not pass GNG. There are no sources about him to be found. Being that a player is still required to pass GNG ultimately this needs to be deleted. -DJSasso (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * We both agree that he is to be presumed notable per NHOCKEY until proven otherwise. Presumably GNG can be demonstrated with the help of Estonian sources, which I am not able to search due to the language barrier. Have you tried looking for Estonian sources? Dolovis (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes actually I have. I am also sure the nominator did as well being from that region. Having dealt with the nom in the past I would find it highly unlikely they would nominate an Estonian unless they could not prove them notable. I would also note, its not notable until proven otherwise, its notable until questioned. The minute the notability is questioned it must be proven. -DJSasso (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.