Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miho Maeshima


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Miho Maeshima

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:NACTOR. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ! dave  09:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Bare minimum biography, no independent coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and no any special achievement to meet WP:PORNBIO. – Ammarpad  &#124;  Talk   09:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete doe not pass WP:Pornbio or WP:GNG with mainly adult film directory references. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete total failure to pass the general notability guidelines. It is a travesty that Wikipedia has over 60 times as many articles on Japnese pornographic film actresses as on Japanese female judges.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.