Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miho Tachibana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Miho Tachibana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No assertion of notability. No awards or nominations. Little or no independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD removed without substantive explanation or article improvement. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I can't read Japanese. Unless the nom can, we probably need someone to check the Japanese language sources before proceeding further. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Well. I can't read Japanese, but Google Translate is workable enough to assess the reliability of the sources. Ref 1 is a "talent" page for Rockza, which identifies itself as an agent for "strip show" performers. Certainly not independent, likely no more reliable than a "Live Nude Coeds" sign, contributing nothing to notability. Same for Ref 7, also a Rockxa page. Ref 2 is a retailer page displaying videos for sale, same assessment. Refs 3 and 5 link to the same page on the now defunct "Urabon Navigator" site, which provided links to various retailers selling the subject's videos, same lack of value in establishing notability. Refs 4 and 6 go to some sort of a Yahoo search page, with a minibiography of the subject sourced to Wikipedia. Again, zero value in establishing notability. The page is apparently based on the Japanese wiki article, where the only reference is a blog. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails PORNBIO and BASIC. Sources fail WP:RS per nom. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * delete BLPs require better sourcing then this. Spartaz Humbug! 06:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the notabity requirements for porn actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.