Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mii Baby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Mii Baby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this quite fits any CSD criteria, but the reference are all just passing mentions or hosted by the company itself. It shows no importance or any coverage in any news sources. TheMesquito buzz  05:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete A news search just brings up press releases. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable brand, and, as written, is marginal as to G11 as advertising. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article establishes notability and nothing found in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 22:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Corporate ad for a run of the mill company. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 12:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.