Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika Aereen Reyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 22:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Mika Aereen Reyes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Non notable ATHLETE. Quis separabit? 21:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Quite a fair bit of coverage in online sources. I'm a bit biased on this since I watch Philippine volleyball, but there has been quite some coverage of her in reliable sources, and not just routine coverage for her volleyball career either. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 07:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication she meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:NCOLLATH. I get a 404 error for two of the article's sources and the other two are not independent, so she doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG, either. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, subject has received passing mention in multiple non-primary reliable sources, but none which is specifically about the subject of this AfD that would be considered significant coverage IMHO. Sure teams that the subject have been on, have won championships, but that doesn't equate presumed notability per WP:NCOLLATH. Therefore, per guidelines, I cannot support keeping this article. The burden of proof is on those who want this article kept.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.