Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Jansson (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. No P&G-based deletion argument brought up. The page does not qualify for speedy deletion under G11, and WP:TNT is not a deletion guideline, but an essay about editorial preferences. If the subject is notable but the tone is promotional, the page can be edited, perhaps from scratch. BLP violations, if any, can be removed, by selective REVDEL, if needed. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Mikael Jansson (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reason: "Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content" that has no foot notes and resume like contents. WP:TNT. There's been no substantial edits besides the name drops I've removed and content additions by model management company associated WP:SPA. Graywalls (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Also qualifies for deletion per reason Deletion policy reason #1 "Content that meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion" "G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion" While WP:ATD should be considered, the burden to clean up after promotional article created by public relations effort to promote shouldn't fall on volunteer editors. Graywalls (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Photography,  and Sweden. Graywalls (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is unquestionably notable (The Wall Street Journal did a piece on him) but this article needs to be stripped of all POV language--which is a lot.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't why it was nom'd. Also, #9. All the flatter without footnotes don't comply with BLP. So, starting all over is a good option here. Graywalls (talk) 18:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I see some salvageable encyclopedic content.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep but the article basically needs to wiped down to a stub from the current state. AlexandraAVX (talk) 10:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete this and start from scratch. Cortador (talk) 11:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. WP:TNT it, unless someone pulls a WP:HEY on it first. the burden to clean up after promotional article created by public relations effort to promote shouldn't fall on volunteer editors is right. -- asilvering (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd support either TNT or !draft, but I can only find the Wall Street Journal article, we'd need a few more sources about him to pass notability. This is very PROMO and badly needs a re-write. Oaktree b (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Since it appears to meet G11, I think deletion reason is satisfied. Notability failure is not the only reason for deletion. I thought of draftifying, but last time I did that, it got undraftified by Liz. Graywalls (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Draft: Not promotional enough for G11, but meets notability due to WSJ article, other articles in Vogue and fashion/photography magazines. Cleo Cooper (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.