Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Pittet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Forgot a Google Scholar WP:BEFORE check was required, so withdrawing. Marking for source improvement. (Nominator withdrawal) (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Mikael Pittet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP does not appear to have any sources that prove notability, thereby failing WP:GNG and WP:NBIO, and certainly not WP:BLP. There is a claim of notability of being widely cited in two fields, but this claim is not backed up by a source that appears reliable. WP:BEFORE did not turn up anything of credible notability either. Books published are not notable. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Inadequate WP:BEFORE if it didn't involve looking at Google Scholar, which shows the subject's work cited over 21,000 times, easily passing WP:NACADEMIC. Bakazaka (talk) 23:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.