Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Rothstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Mikael Rothstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:AUTHOR. Tgeairn (talk) 03:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. He's attracted considerable press. I found a large amount of coverage of his opinions and one article entirely about him on the occasion of his 50th birthday. He's also co-edited at least one prestigious book (for Cambridge University Press) since the article was put together, there's at least one archived program on Danish Radio that is him sharing his opinions, and there are a large number of citations of his work on new religious movements. I've filled out the article with a lot of Danish sources, but there are also brief mentions in the New York Times of one of his statements. Clear pass of the GNG, in my opinion, and I believe he also meets WP:PROF for his influence in his field. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As far as I can tell, the sources seem to be independent and cover him substantially. Borock (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets WP:BASIC notability criteria for WP:BIO. The provided references show the subject has significant coverage in independent reliable sources, such as Kristeligt Dagblad, Politiken, and Berlingsle Tidende. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I originality closed as Keep but nom was a bit unhappy so to keep everyone happy I've reopened. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.