Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ansari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Mike Ansari

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not believe that this article meets the WP:BIO criteria and it appears to be a WP:PROMO. I have been unable to find any reliable sources suggesting otherwise. Most of the references are to a book written by the subject of the article. Chocmilk03 (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with the nominator. All the sources that aren't actually written by him barely mention him. A BEFORE search was attempted but I could only find sources about the Christian evangelist of the same name. Spiderone  18:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – simply not notable; clear case of WP:PROMO.  Schwede 66  02:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – clearly WP:PROMO. NZFC  (talk) (cont)  06:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely not notable as a martial artist. Most of the references are articles by the subject and the others are, at best, passing mentions.  There is nothing that shows the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG and I don't see evidence that any SNG is met.  As this is one of only two articles edited by its creator, I suspect there is a COI. Papaursa (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.