Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Anthony Fernando


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Orangemike, CSD A7: No credible indication of importance. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Mike Anthony Fernando

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources; only sources are one's YouTube link and a Wikipedia article. Article was last time tagged with PROD, but the creator removed it. Google search returns anything but reliable, published sources. theinstantmatrix (talk) 09:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Note that according to a post today at that User:Mikeart67 is the subject, Mike Anthony Fernando, so the whole article is a Conflict of Interest. .     Jim. .  (Jameslwoodward)   (talk to me) 11:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, User:St170e declined the submission of Draft:Mike Anthony Fernando yesterday. .     Jim. .  (Jameslwoodward)   (talk to me) 11:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as NN per nom and Jim.  — Jeff G. ツ 11:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom and Jim.--Rpclod (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - unsuitable on so many grounds. KJP1 (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * delete per nom and Jim Eddie891 Talk Work 16:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.