Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bailey (wrestler)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Mike Bailey (wrestler)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NATHLETE. The citations are almost all wrestling outlets of questionable reliability. There's only one sentence about the subject's private life which means the subject fails WP:ANYBIO, too. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Cagematch is the most cited source and is proven reliable at WP:PW/RS. It's second most cited source is Wrestlingdata, which is fine for match and show results only, which is all it's used for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TDOldSpice (talk • contribs) 19:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Cagematch is only for results. Wrestlingdata is not considered a reliable source per WP:PW/RS. Here it is used as a source for birthname, birthplace, weight, height and trainers. Internet Wrestling Database and 411Mania are not reliable either and WrestleZone is just flat out unreliable. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)   (ZOOM)  21:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the article has reliable sources thats were proven — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.236.58.153 (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ribbon Salminen. WrestlingData accounts for a large portion of the refs, unreliable per WP:PW/RS. Independent news coverage is needed to prove notability.  JTP (talk • contribs) 16:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.