Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Blazo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 11:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Mike Blazo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

May not be notable enough to merit an article. He did manage quite a while in the minor leagues, but I'm not sure if that is enough "notability". You decide. Alex (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable.  --Muboshgu (talk)
 * Keep Enough coaching experience to make him notable, and there are sources. Edward321 (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE but substantial coverage indicates that he meets basic WP:BIO. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The coverage is enough for me.  Jujutacular  T · C 06:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be nine articles in Google News, seems to be enough to meet WP:BIO. elgnomo talk 17:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.