Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Blazo (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Mike Blazo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In the last AfD, a couple of users asserted that there was enough sourcing to provide notability. Neither provided convincing evidence, but there was very minimal participation in the discussion, which was eventually closed as 'no consensus'. I remain unpersuaded of the subject's notability and would prefer to see this given a more thorough review. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Never played in higher in a league higher than AA or managed above B level. Doesn't meet the notability for baseball players. My search didn't find significant coverage to claim he meets WP:GNG. I found a column in a local paper about him, but that's all. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps this page shouldn't have been created without better sourcing, but it isn't surprising that there's a lack of online sources for a guy whose baseball career occurred in the 1930s and 1940s. On the plus side, if this page is deleted, there's already a better page at Baseball Reference Bullpen, so the internet won't be losing any info. with a deletion. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. If looking through older newspapers for info isn't satisfying GNG (I looked last time and this time, found nothing non-routing), then it's clear he's non-notable. Wizardman  20:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wizardman. Spanneraol (talk) 02:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasoning above. Trut-h-urts man  (T • C) 16:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.