Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Cahen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Mike Cahen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has lacked independent RS since creation in March 2008. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 23:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ~SS49~   {talk}  23:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  ~SS49~   {talk}  23:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  ~SS49~   {talk}  23:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Mccapra (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with above. Actaudio (talk) 07:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lots of google hits for his name but they are mostly credits-related listings or music purchase sites that confirm his proficiency as an active, working professional, but nothing that I could find of significant independent coverage in reliable sources that indicates notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Legion X (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find really any RS to justify keeping this. The article has existed for a long time as well without them, so people have had plenty of time to add them if they existed, but they sadly do not. Cindlevet (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.