Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Cavanaugh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Mike Cavanaugh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm sending this here from Prod: head coach of an important college team needs a community decision. Personally, I could see it either way.  DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: WP:NHOCKEY stipulates that coaches can qualify, but as if they were players. Players in college hockey fall under criterion #4, which accords presumptive notability for "Achieved preeminent honours (all-time top ten career scorer, First Team All-Star, All-American) in a lower minor league such as the Central Hockey League or the United Hockey League, in a major junior league such as those of the Canadian Hockey League, or in a major collegiate hockey league (Note: merely playing in a major junior league or major collegiate hockey is not enough to satisfy inclusion requirements)"  Being an assistant coach for many years, even for a major program such as BC, isn't enough; being NCAA Coach of the Year would.  Cavanaugh's notability, therefore, would solely hinge on whether he meets the GNG.   Ravenswing   16:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Doesn't meet the GNG and I don't believe being the assistant coach of the year is quite enough.204.126.132.231 (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I wouldn't really call Cavanaugh's coverage "significant", and therefore I do not think the coach passes the general notability guideline. T  C  N7 JM  18:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.