Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Degurse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Mike Degurse

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 12:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 08:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 08:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, doesn't meet NHOCKEY Power~enwiki (talk) 20:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: very little coverage and what does exist is only routine local newspapers. Seems to have had his number retired by a low level team. Otherwise fails GNG and definitely fails NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.