Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dreams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Mike Dreams
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability appears to be quite questionable Eeekster (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is one new interview in the "alternative weekly newspaper" City Pages that might make this worth reconsidering, but one interview in a local industry tabloid is still far from enough to make this artist pass WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. And I for one am having enough with this continued blatant promotion. Once this topic gains encyclopedic notability, let someone else start the article, please. Amalthea  00:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete – There's almost enough to consider it notable, but right now it still doesn't meet WP:MUSIC. The AV club reference is pretty misleading, actually. Actual coverage there would probably make it notable, but that's just a show announcement and most of those are just handed to publications by the artist's management. No indication that the content on there was actually written by Onion staff. X X X antiuser eh? 01:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Some additional internal references have been added and things I believe could be considered as "promotion" has been removed. (Minnesotamusic (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC))
 * Has anyone had a chance to review some of the cleaning up and revisions of the new? (Minnesotamusic (talk) 13:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC))  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.72.10 (talk)
 * Those additional sources are either unreliable or only trivially mention the topic, if at all. Amalthea  19:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:MUSIC. -- Quar te t  19:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.