Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Duma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Mike Duma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unable to find any substantial coverage of the subject in reliable sources as is required to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

I do think that the inclusion of Fox Buisness News, botObjects, Tech Crunch would be enough to substantiate the person in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:4D03:3B00:980B:A82D:4DE7:18FB (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * They need to discuss the subject in depth, not just mention him in passing. SmartSE (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Techcrunch, the Verge, and Crunchbase are not reliable sources. They are purveyors of press releases. Nothing about botObjects reflects on Duma after December 2015, so be careful when doing a WP:BEFORE. Rhadow (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete existing sources as well as a search do not establish notability.104.163.148.25 (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of in depth coverage. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – promotional piece on subject who lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Citobun (talk) 06:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.