Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Freese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Mike Freese

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability. Sources consist of trivial coverage in reliable sources and Youtube videos. Hirolovesswords (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS. Needs more than a few trivial mentions in the news to establish notability. Yes, he exists, and he's been at some campaign rallies. But you can't write a substantial and reliable article from that. We hold WP:BLPs to a high standard. Vcessayist (talk) 00:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Weak keep  About 6 suitable references have at least a couple paragraphs on him.    None cover him in substantial depth.  RW notability appears to exist. North8000 (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with Vcessayist WP:NOT and not WP:N despite many supporting references. Kooky2 (talk) 01:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:43, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. He's just some guy walking around with a hat on.  How can anyone be serious about retaining this?  It should be speedied off the face of Wikipedia forever. Qworty (talk) 10:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.